Sponsor Advertisement
Declassified Report Sheds Light on Clinton's Health and Russian Intelligence During 2016 Election

Declassified Report Sheds Light on Clinton's Health and Russian Intelligence During 2016 Election

A recently declassified House Intelligence Committee report reveals Russian intelligence had damaging information on Hillary Clinton's health in 2016. Despite her alleged health issues, Vladimir Putin opted not to release the details, believing Clinton would win the presidency.

A declassified House Intelligence Committee report has brought to light that Russian intelligence gathered potentially damaging information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s health during the 2016 presidential campaign. The report, made public by current Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Wednesday, indicates that the SVR, Russia’s foreign intelligence service, had evidence suggesting Clinton was battling “psycho-emotional problems” treated with strong sedatives.

The report, based on 20 interviews with intelligence officers and FBI agents, as well as source material from a 2017 report initiated by former President Barack Obama, claims that Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of “heavy tranquilizers.” According to the Conservative Brief, these medications were used to manage uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, as indicated by Democratic National Committee communications in the possession of the SVR.

Despite the alleged health concerns, the report notes that Clinton remained focused on her presidential aspirations, described as being “obsessed with a thirst for power.” In September 2016, President Obama and Democratic Party leaders reportedly found Clinton’s health “extraordinarily alarming,” fearing it could jeopardize her chances against Donald Trump. At 77, Clinton was said to suffer from a range of health issues, including Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with her advisers maintaining the "strictest secrecy" around the full details of her condition.

Furthermore, the SVR reportedly had in its possession a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Clinton to draw connections between Putin, Russian hackers, and Trump as a strategy to divert attention from her email server scandal. Echoing Gabbard’s findings, Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) claimed on Thursday that Clinton was taking tranquilizers while in office.

Gabbard’s statement also shed light on documents that suggest the Obama administration orchestrated a “coup” against then-President-elect Donald Trump by pushing the narrative of collusion between Russia and Trump to influence the election outcome. She underscored that Russia had the damaging material against Clinton but chose not to disclose it.

In the wake of these revelations, the U.S. Department of Justice has formed a “strike force” to investigate the evidence declassified by Gabbard regarding the alleged involvement of the Obama administration in fabricating the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. A DOJ source informed Fox News Digital that all leads are under review, and the National Security Division is expected to play a role in the probe. Justice officials have emphasized that they take the alleged weaponization of intelligence by the Obama administration “with the utmost seriousness.”

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

While the declassified report raises questions about Hillary Clinton's health during the 2016 presidential campaign, it is crucial to approach this information with caution and avoid jumping to conclusions. As progressives, we advocate for the right to privacy, including health privacy, and we must be wary of using personal health issues as political weapons.

The focus on Clinton's health and the accusations of a so-called "coup" against President Trump detract from the more significant concerns of Russian interference in our electoral process. Progressives are committed to protecting the integrity of our elections and ensuring that foreign entities do not influence the democratic will of the American people.

Moreover, the allegations against the Obama administration require thorough investigation. If there were any oversteps, they must be addressed transparently and fairly. However, it is equally important to ensure that such investigations are not driven by partisan vendettas. The progressive stance is to safeguard our institutions from foreign and domestic threats alike while maintaining our commitment to justice and the rule of law.

Conservative View

The revelations from the declassified House Intelligence Committee report affirm long-standing conservative concerns over the integrity and transparency of the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration. It is distressing, but not surprising, to hear that Hillary Clinton, despite her health issues, continued to pursue the presidency with an undiminished zeal for power. This report reinforces our belief in the necessity of strong leadership unimpeded by personal health crises that could potentially compromise national decision-making.

The conservative perspective is one of deep suspicion towards the actions of the Obama administration, particularly in its alleged efforts to delegitimize President Trump's election victory. The declassified documents suggest an abuse of power at the highest levels of government, with intelligence being potentially weaponized for political gain. Such actions, if true, would constitute a grave threat to democratic principles and the rule of law.

The formation of a DOJ strike force to investigate these allegations is a step in the right direction. It is imperative that we uphold the integrity of our intelligence agencies and ensure that they are free from partisan misuse. The conservative call for accountability and transparency is not about political retribution; it is about preserving the sanctity of our democratic institutions and ensuring that no individual or administration is above the law.

Common Ground

Both conservative and progressive viewpoints can agree on the importance of election integrity and the need for transparency in government actions. Regardless of political affiliation, there is a shared interest in ensuring that intelligence services are not misused for partisan purposes. The establishment of a DOJ strike force to investigate the allegations serves as a point of convergence, where both sides can support a fair and impartial inquiry into the events surrounding the 2016 election.