Sponsor Advertisement
FDA Grants Full Approval to Moderna Vaccine for At-Risk Young Children

FDA Grants Full Approval to Moderna Vaccine for At-Risk Young Children

The FDA has fully approved Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax, for children 6 months to 11 years with underlying health conditions. This follows policy changes by HHS Secretary RFK Jr. and has sparked debate among conservatives.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a significant step by granting full approval to Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax, for young children with certain health vulnerabilities. The decision, announced on July 10, 2025, allows pediatric use of the vaccine for children aged six months to 11 years who have underlying health conditions that increase their risk for severe illness from COVID-19.

This approval marks Spikevax as the first pediatric COVID vaccine to receive full authorization in the United States, albeit with a limited scope. The announcement comes amid broader vaccine policy changes under Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Earlier this year, Kennedy Jr. ended federal recommendations for routine COVID-19 vaccination of healthy children and pregnant women, aligning with updated data and revised risk assessments.

Moderna confirmed that the FDA had approved a supplemental application for Spikevax, extending full licensure to the specified pediatric group. The vaccine has been fully approved for individuals aged 12 and older since 2022. Additionally, Moderna revealed that an updated formulation of the vaccine would be available in time for the 2025–26 respiratory virus season.

According to current guidance, a two-dose regimen is recommended for unvaccinated children aged six to 23 months, and a single dose for older children or those who have already completed a primary series. This FDA decision follows the disbandment of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which had been evaluating vaccine recommendations for children.

Dr. Fiona Havers, a medical epidemiologist and former member of the CDC's respiratory virus hospitalization network, expressed concern about the limited eligibility. She pointed out that a significant number of children hospitalized for COVID-19 are under age two and do not have any underlying health conditions. Havers resigned from the CDC following the policy changes and highlighted that infants under six months—who are ineligible for the vaccine—have some of the highest COVID hospitalization rates.

The narrowing of vaccine eligibility has prompted some health experts to warn that it could lead to confusion among parents and potentially limit access to the vaccine. With federal recommendations now withdrawn for the broader pediatric population, physicians might exercise more caution in advising off-label use without strong government backing.

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel supported the FDA's decision, stating, "COVID-19 continues to pose a significant potential threat to children, especially those with underlying medical conditions. Vaccination can be an important tool for protecting our youngest against severe disease and hospitalization."

Despite the approval, the decision has been met with criticism from some conservative figures. Gunther Eagleman, a conservative commentator, questioned the move, citing concerns over myocarditis risks. Blaze TV host Steve Deace and epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher also expressed disapproval, with Hulscher calling the regulatory agencies "completely compromised."

As the debates continue, families with young children are left to navigate the complexities of vaccine safety and government involvement in health decisions.

Advertisement

The Flipside: Different Perspectives

Progressive View

Progressives applaud the FDA's full approval of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine for at-risk children as a necessary step in protecting the most vulnerable populations. They argue that the government has a responsibility to safeguard public health, especially when it concerns children who may not be able to advocate for themselves. The decision to limit the vaccine's use to those with underlying health conditions is seen as a science-based approach to maximize benefits while minimizing risks.

They point to the collective responsibility to prevent the spread of infectious diseases and the role vaccines play in achieving herd immunity. Progressives also highlight the importance of trusting expert regulatory agencies and the rigorous processes they follow to ensure vaccine safety and efficacy.

Furthermore, progressives often emphasize the need for equity in healthcare, advocating for access to vaccines for all children, especially those from marginalized communities who are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. They call for continued government support and funding for vaccine research, distribution, and public education campaigns to combat misinformation.

Conservative View

The FDA's decision to grant full approval to Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine for at-risk children has been met with skepticism from the conservative community. Many are questioning the necessity and safety of vaccinating young children, particularly when considering potential side effects such as myocarditis. The conservative base, including former President Donald Trump's MAGA supporters, view this move as an overreach of government authority, particularly when individual choice and parental rights are at stake.

Critics argue that the government's role should be to provide information and allow parents to make informed decisions for their children's health, rather than mandating or pushing for widespread vaccination. Furthermore, they express concern over the long-term effects of new vaccines and the rapid pace at which they are being approved and distributed. The disbanding of the CDC's ACIP is seen as a troubling sign that vaccine policy is being driven by politics rather than science.

Conservatives emphasize the importance of maintaining personal liberties and ensuring that any public health policy is grounded in transparent data and respects the rights of individuals to make decisions for themselves and their families. They also argue for a more focused approach to vaccination, prioritizing those at highest risk rather than applying broad mandates.

Common Ground

Both conservatives and progressives can agree on the importance of protecting children's health and ensuring the safety of vaccines. There is common ground in the desire for transparent and data-driven processes within regulatory agencies, and a shared concern for the well-being of at-risk populations. Both sides also recognize the need for parental involvement in making informed health decisions for their children.